- First Name
- Brady
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2024
- Threads
- 0
- Messages
- 40
- Reaction score
- 43
- Location
- North Carolina
- Vehicles
- Chevy Volt, BMW X3
Agreed on a system like that being probably too complex for the benefit, and for oil and filter changes (and anything else on the service schedule) which I'm assuming (hoping) wouldn't be necessary.“pretty easy” is a relative term. I wouldn’t have the knowledge and experience, but a skilled mechanic will probably already have the tools on hand. I doubt there will be an engine drop mode (hydraulics that lower the engine), something like that is another point of chronic failure.
Changing filters and oil could probably be done in the driveway, if not, people will riot. Scout is on record in multiple sources stating 80% of the trucks can be serviced by the end user.
But what about repairs requiring access to the cylinder head. What if I need to change an ignition coil pack? There should be an removable access panel in the floor of the bed/trunk allowing that without the need to drop the engine. I'd go further and say there should be an engineering requirement that the only time the engine should have to be dropped is when the engine in a front engine vehicle with an conventional hood would need to be removed for the same procedure.
Because they've decided to put the engine in the rear and under the vehicle shouldn't impose additional requirements on whoever is working on it, whether end consumer, mechanic, etc.
Going back to my earlier comment if dropping this engine is needed more often than for a conventional arrangement it will need to be automated and "idiot proof" if consumers have to do it. But to me the best solution is not having that requirement to begin with.